3) The Inner Nature of the 4 Faculties of Science

The material World 1 is opened up by the universal, in terms of time and space, content- and context-free, number-based science#1 of innate nature how matter is moved by energies. The world 2 of social life is opened up by the wordy, personally-neutral science#2. The world 3 of rational, symbolic thinking is opened up by the art of expression#0 up to recoding Creation with man-made forms and events. In terms of sciences#1-2-0 it seem that those three world emerged in the above order of awareness#3, at last, of one-self's being#3, contrary to then cyclical social evolution#0-2-1-0 in its permanently self-destructive dynamics. The arrows below point from the outer responsibility, institutionalized in the world under OPTION I in the faculties of sciences#0-0, 2-2, 1-1, succeeding the former temples and courts, pre-trans- traping conscience#3 as "subjective", e.g, non-scientific, in business as so far usual. Under OPTION I conscience#3 is in fact a threat to what humanity has paid so far with tears, sweat, and blood, the evil OPTION I ideology. However, as long as there are still real human beings, those arrows below point to the inner conscience#1-2-0-3 of personal responsibility for matter, society and its forms, the last one, conscience#3 pointing to what post-normal philosophy tries to engulf as world 4.  According also to the Bible, at least the Greeks honored world 4 with the "unknown god". Unwilling to pay tribute to, beware, understand any necessity and superior order in terms of the intention of the Creator with his Creation and Creature, but greedily ambitious to be the leading and basic science 2-2 about those four worlds and spiritually beyond, the emergence of matter out of the void of nothing, life out of matter, rational abstract thinking out of life, philosophy attributes it all and thus itself with all its category errors and non-sequitures, to the so-called principle of radical contingency (PoRD). It says, as if it could say anything to anybody, that all possibilities can emerge, or not. That is merely recoding the meanwhile discredited evolution 0-0 myth, in fact thus proving this kind of philosophy as a cargo cult science...

Claiming that death above all, philosophy getting unmasked of its hidden agenda, is always coming too soon, thus being an agent of injustice - God to be blamed, if he is not dead already. Speculative realism finds eternal life, of course without God as a catalyst, the only dignifying condition for what it calls, "humans". In a non-sequitur based on the PoRC, post-normal philosophy's conclusion is, world 4 is one of justice with human who can only think the truth. And that of course in philosophical terms of "I think, therefore I am!", making humans wishfully god-like, which then constitutes the virtual murdering of God in one's mind.  In the sense that by living forever, philosophy has thus found the trick to claim all humans to be its equal clones in the sense the finally all people have thought all the true thoughts. And this equality with which Marx & Co. tinkered, should thus deliver the speculative chance that world 4 emerges of course under the lead of philosophy, it, itself under OPTION I. For that to happen a mediator is postulated. For the transitions of world 1 to world 2, since it has already happened, no God is needed anymore, similarly neither for the transition from world 2 to 0 as it is in place. In that sense Nietzsche not only postulated that God is dead, but that he actually, if he every existed, got murdered as outlined above. And so from now on, after the assumed God-less evolution, the PoRC takes over with all its corresponding non-sequiturs and category errors of philosophy all along. For the last transition from the world 3 of rational thinking to the postulated world 4 of rational justice among eternally living "humans", since it has not emerged yet, three kinds of mediators are envisaged; "God" by Leibnitz, the "evil man" by Nietzsche (Hitler & Co. had a go) and what philosophy thinks of as a child-like mediator. Of course that is disguising the actual reference to the might of the 2-2 palace, the glory of the 0-0 art temple of the snake, and the 1-1 idealized service of innocent people to be left in ignorance about how their souls are 2-0 sucked in psycho-political ways by dividing them from their OPTION II. Quentin Meillassoux tries to show (for this subtle purpose, for what else?) that the agnostic scepticism of those who doubt the reality of cause and effect must be transformed (by a MATRIX of divine inexistence?) into a radical certainty that there is no such thing as causal necessity at all. This leads Meillassoux to proclaim that it is absolutely necessary that the laws of nature be contingent. His world therefore is a kind of hyper-chaos in which the principle of sufficient reason is abandoned even while the principle of non-contradiction must be retained (in order to screw) understanding - for what else?

The 1-1 implementation of science#1 has meanwhile been 00-recoded as the market economy to compete with the 2-2 palace of politics, and the 0-0 temple of arts for OPTION I superiority over the souls inhibiting people's conscience#3 as irrelevant in institutionalized science under the spell of OPTION I. Thus "God" has becomes the fig leave for the inner dynamic of 0-2 philosophy, a perceptual background to absurdity. Rather than indulging in speculative reality, here science#3 is employed to uncover the obscured reality of real human beings:                                   

- Quantitative science#1 of material nature has evolved evolutionary (feeling reaches beyond being - to the universe) in exploring the outer world beyond the inner resources, to amplify one's position power by accepting that a sufficient understanding of the laws of nature of one's material context is essential before designing tangible technology that can only work based on it.

- The wordy denotational humanities#2 developed the other way round based on the elite's priority of shooting / convincing with arguments first to get others involved, dividing their essence with tangible requirements, to be able to rule them – politicians with mass-attractive promises, thinking later about the consequences to remain in power nevertheless.

- With artfully expressive science#0, the artist develops his or her forms creatively (being comes beyond feeling the context) to claim one's definition power by getting the style sufficiently attractive before using a technique to depict something tangibly.

- Science#3 develops creativity in a real human being's understanding of the reality of those concerned inner substance in terms of it lifefulfillment, before claiming to be essential in the other sciences' usage and meaning in the material world 1, the word 2 of social life, and the world 3 of thinking in view of Life-Fulfilling Platforms, on which art#0, humanities#2 and hard science#1 are the means and not the based on conscience#3' understanding of the relevant laws of lifefulfillment.

APS : Applied Personal Science#3 APS© giving meaning to innate substance
LF    : Life-Fulfillment (personal), -Fulfilling Platform overcoming OPTION I
oegp: open-ended generative principles

The 8 "dark evil inner voices" ruthlessly configuring OPTION I
?0  illusion, fantasy, spirituality
*3  egoistic will, social Darwinism – 1st temptation
+2  more of the same, amplification, dissemination, greed, tools, systems
-4   away from frustration, protection, fear, weapons – 2nd temptation
%1 political correctness, social compatibility, best practice, governance
%5 manipulating %1 competing for the next trend
%6 projecting an ideology
ZG spirit of the time, zeitgeist – 3rd temptation of Christ…

"We have unraveled the mysteries of the starry welkin, sounded the depths of the seas, delved deep into the bowels of the earth, braved blinding blizzards on snowy Mount Everest, and are now out exploring space so as to establish interplanetary relations, but sad to say, have not found out the mystery of the human soul within."
-Sant Kirpal Singh

The 16 inner ethical levels beyond §1-B5 outlined above, give
H1 hope for what is worthy for a rational human; a
H2 superior order of eternal justice allowing
H3 dealing with reality in a lifefulfilling way by
H4 understanding the inner relationship truth, as a precondition for
L1 love; engaging based on giving meaning to life- through task-fulfillment
L2 and beyond with timely exchange of project-oriented competence up to
L3 reframing the inner and outer context to reduce apparent contingency;
     lacking understanding, arbitrariness - the meaninglessness of OPTION I,
     before the point of NO return from a collapse…

Context