3.14/L1) Understand Putin's basic 3 Ideologies 

How does Vladimir manage to turn global politics into a 11-workshop about this planet’s future?

Under his basically content-free#1 terms, he comes up with his plan B of relating his outside politics towards his inside I-concepts about the Bm-boundary conditions to be multiplied to sustain his regime!

- But first let us begin with his h-living space as his personal sphere of influence, which he managed to extend with his 13-ideology as its think tool over the whole Russian Federation and beyond:

Putin's approach is appealing for in the living space we were, according to Heidegger all thrown#1 into when born. And Russians especially like some great, mighty, invincible guidance pointing in 13-propehtic manners to the corner stones. By the way, in Switzerland, Christoph Blocher employs the same 3 out of the possible 12 basic ideologies, that for the h-living space, the X-being, and the I-conceptualization with a comparable success like Putin: The corner stones of any personally relevant#3 lifefulfilling society are real human beings! Putin personally needs that kind of a h-living space for himself to make seemingly relevant speeches for Russia and the people who identify with its past glory. And with that in mind, Putin's plan A is to seek ways to remain part of the world's leaders to be able to play in his terms, L1-lovingly for his people in the global living space.

 
But real persons, Vladimir as he would like to be, as well as you and I, are also the stumbling blocks for the management of humanity’s so far primarily cultivated OPTION I; mass-attractivity as the measure of all things. It allows spinning hypes of one group against the other of thus channeled opinions, but no substantial contributions from real human beings, inhibited by the 3 taboos. However, to make OPTION I operational with people affected by words:

- the right to vote a self-serving and/or a simply OPTION I Zeitgeist defaulting government out of office is required to

- keep the mass attached to its government managed OPTION I, which we call demo-cracy. And that requires not just

- free but substantial speech, not just a

- free but a lifefulfilling market, and not just

- free media, but for conscious people one, dedicated to Lifefulfilling Platforms the actual OPTION II purpose of any real human being, and that up to being able to successfully

- defend ones right in a court of law even against OPTION I wardens.

After all, who wants a government that cares more about its OPTION I, than for his or her OPTION II, more for the common, than for his or her own good? Though all these rights are necessary for OPTION II and are thus the acid test of a not just of a free, but of a lifefulfilling society, it has not emerged that way under OPTION I. And despite the fact, that there cannot be any sustainably desirable freedom without lifefulfillment, the indicated relationship truths are still not mass-attractive! So why do things become mass-attractive when nobody in his or her right mind can honestly want them? Are we karma-ridden, up to all the terrible war and genocide victims, and/or still under the spell of the first sin by which Adam and Eve were thrown out of paradise? Both Putin and Blocher likewise do not want to give in to the zeitgeist's evil 00-22-11 circle, aiming at a more relevant living space with their 13-ideology for their own people and beyond,

- Blocher for Switzerland surrounded by an OPTION I EU, having made Swiss people vote against an EU-membership,

- Putin for his elite and Russia, feeling en traped by the US-OPTION I led western world having reduced Russia to a mere regional power and Putin to a bored schoolboy, has willfully involved the West as we will see, in a 11-workshop under his major influence, in the name of Russia...

The way to judge where for them their h-ideology is as a think-tool a means rather than the purpose for a hidden agenda, you need to check whether their H3-relationship to the relevant reality enables them to >4 pacify the situation, without resorting to victim power and justifying using means that make things worse...

Context