222-Implementation:
[UP] [Challenges] [Requirement] [Conscience] [Maintenance]
Nothing
aM-man-made
is
fulfilling
without
understanding and
cO-considering
the relevant relationship truths
How to keep a relationship
Alive and with Synergy
This site
only makes sense for people who have had the
conscious experience
(free but priceless;
Facebook picture from Melissa,
hX:64)
of falling into a relevant EXISTENTIAL LOVE CODEd relationship
and are now
willing to maintain
that relationships'
possible
synergy. Please reconsider
the exemplary experience about
fulfillment in a relationship and also
aM /
cO = STRESS
< DEATH to begin
deepening your understanding:
"Whatever we do unconsciously, reactively, automatically; we probably fail? But performed consciously, our awareness grows,
I guess?" That is the kind of the
zeitgeist prophet's rhetoric with which these devil's
advocates try to open other people's
Pandora's box - like the zeitgeist, to make all their subjects
equal. Look at what is
on the tongues of many of the figures in the picture below; the
flames (subtle hypes)!
It depicts this >1 very bad influence
creeping, not just into my h-living space, like a plague. On the
left side you see the man
standing up with §3-integrity,
who was aware of the group's
OPTION I degeneration;
Niklaus von Flüe, who actually saved Switzerland 1481 from
the zeitgeist, against which it was founded
1291. Based on his insight into what was >6
very good about Switzerland and his X-life-task
to save it, which shines through on top of the picture; his
EXISTENTIAL LOVE
CODE with his
country. After he refused to be their leader, as did Jesus on Palm
Sunday, every interaction of his
led to synergy up to saving Switzerland from a civil war
in which it could have been dissolved within a mad
Europe. His approach works is required in our time beyond
intellectuals who
have
mutated into substance- and country traitors as is
mass-attractive in the
OPTION I. Its time actually ended
on Nov. 24, 2016. This
end was initiated in my home country specifically since 1991, when the
Swiss intellectuals began putting the
supposed self-fulfilling prophecy "700-years
Switzerland is enough!" into action. Who can be surprised when people seek
fulfillment in other countries to balance the narrow-mindedness in their
own, when it is betraying the ELC with their citizens, in the name of the
supposed media
demo-crazy, or in Spain
against it once moren. As above, so
below; loving relationships and synergy
evoke jealousy and subtle challenges,
so most people would rather stay single like
Papageno (page
42) in Mozart's Magic Flute when faced with the challenge
of investing their lives in
friendship and love (page
40) for which Tamino, the Prince, e.g. relying on
understanding the relevant, open-ended
generative principles, qualified, like me (upper)
and Melissa (lower line in our pM-S
Pandora's boxes),
facing the zeitgeist's temptation to become
divided in order to be
ruled. People fall when they allow the
zeitgeist zombies to limit them in
their own >qualification in maintaining the relationship:
2Cd |
3D |
>6/B3 |
|
p |
|
2Ed |
2D |
>6/§0 |
common
ground based on
the OPTION II p-perception |
1Eh |
2D |
>6/§0 |
|
M |
|
2Cd |
OP |
>6/B5 |
common
purpose
towards a
M-maximal
perspective |
1Ed |
2D |
>4/B2 |
|
S |
|
1Kd |
3D |
>2/H2 |
synergy
when S-
defocusing from
OPTION I
|
|
p-Focusing on |
Understanding |
M-Tuning in |
Trusting |
S-Synergy |
Challenges |
OI |
2d
design structure |
C/E
creation/evolution |
1Eh<2Cd |
1.d |
K/E |
OII |
D
standing up for the |
#2/3
that is where the zeitgeist temps us
to turn away from
each other... |
2<0 |
D/P |
D |
2/3 |
> |
>6 for
the best |
6 |
4>2 |
= |
While it is easy for us to
focus on what
is necessary for us#2 to agree on
D-definition power based on the
B3-paths which I outline for Melissa to
§0-sustain the basis of the
>6 very best we can come up with. |
If we tune into
what is our >6 very good purpose of our relationship, we
go beyond the intellectual power game in which the
palace#2 < is framed by the
temple#0 so both can rule the
people#1... |
Synergy
through d-designing how to serve#1
people with appropriate D-definition power to overcome
what is >2 bad inside themselves so their world can come
to >4 peace, in synergy. |
≠ |
We have to mutually
understand
both our ways - mine as a
C-creative researcher in
personally-relevant#3
matters; under OPTION I, in
seeming opposition to Melissa's
caring for the E-evolution
of personally-neutral#2 ways to
help being
successful - in her words as a
"benevolent dictator", emotionally the 1st Prince/first
among equals in giving hope. |
We need to trust
our own but different powers; my for D-defining
OPTION II as
generally the best, Melissa in her position, how to
convince people to give them a
lifefulfilling chance
based on her exemplary experience
just as she does it for healthy
nourishment. |
Here the challenge is that when my d-designs are proven
right#2, I fine tune them in
E-evolutio-nary ways, while Melissa has a need to support
what works with personal#3 C-creativity.
This page is just one of the results of our
synergy, even when she was at another end of the world when I
did it, her energy was still around.
|
11
Rf
33 |
If we fail to maintain our ELC, we end up §1§2-raving
about how we f-felt about our possible R-(re)solutions;
me in terms of the >1 very bad unqualified y-necessity in
my h-living space, Melissa about her >3 dissatisfaction
about having failed to become sufficiently essential in her J-self-justification
|
And here is another example with me and
Claudio Lütscher, 7Ow, a long
time friend and a
film producer, w-working out films with the O-objective
of gaining F7-influence on the meaning of
OPTION II in relationships:
1Cd |
0P |
>3/B4 |
11 |
1Cd |
0P |
>3/B4 |
|
1Cd |
3D |
>6/B5 |
|
I |
|
bv |
|
I |
|
- |
|
X |
|
1Cd |
0P |
>4/L2 |
66 |
1Cd |
0P |
>4/L2 |
|
2Cd |
0P |
>6/H4 |
|
Our ELC is
16 + 66
=> II-X: We cooperate best in I-conceptualizing X-LifeFulfilling
Platforms such as for Workshops. |
In fact you can notice that we have little potential friction
about our common I-conceptualization, though our X-essential approach is quite different when it comes to
X-synergy: Claudio with his
OPTION I 2Cd is > intellectually above mine with
1Cd,
while my 3D OPTION II is, even as intellectually inappropriate,
above 0P - a good reason to overcome
the intellectual pecking order with what makes a >6 very good space of synergy for
me modeling
B5-life's fulfillment in terms of
Claudio's interest in the relevant H4-ways to relate to the
underlying laws of life. If we fail in synergy, then we are left
trying to b-balance our v-values, me in terms of the >1
very bad unqualified y-necessity in my h-living space, Claudio in search
of the fast dwindling, (before the
point of NO return still marginally possible >6 very good
S-defocus in his
f-feelings. But in our II-X coded relationship, among others, Claudio's presence supported me
in
automating the wording (left side below) of our ELC
based in its II-X parameters:
Peter+Claudio |
16+66=>II-X |
|
Of course the computer created text
to the right from the
ELC Parameters requires editing from someone
who fully understands the system: |
I-concept of
our |
common project |
for the clarification
of |
Pe>1 very bad |
Cl>6 very good |
|
...beyond
bv-raving 11-66, the purpose is to give
meaning to OPTION II with all appropriate means each of
us has available from videos to
LifeFulfilling Platforms in
Workshops, beginning with supporting people to get clear
about the hx-"baby"
awareness; me
16
(covering the h>1 with the
X>6 very good), Claudio 66 (perfectionist
in video production), meeting people where they come from,
under OPTION I,
open for OPTION II... |
with the §2-purpose |
for this I-concept
for |
Pe>6 very good |
Cl>6 very good |
which allows synergy |
in a X-being/substance
way |
|
Claudio comes from the very
hX>6
very good, h-grounded in the
G4-truth of
X-being in tune with the
H4-substantial
relationship truth, seeking his way
to G5-life, examples of which interest
him e.g.
Permaculture -
it cannot be [Claudio's master video] that
humanity destroys
what the plant
mind has fulfilled in our living space, Earth! That is the common
>1 very bad ground we are
dedicated to restoring with the >6 very best in us. Some think we
are crazy and not ok... |
Donald Trump + Kim Jong-un:
2Ch |
3D |
>5/B2 |
65 |
1Eh |
2D |
>6/H1 |
|
0Eh |
2D |
>5/§3 |
|
b |
|
IS |
|
p |
|
- |
|
y |
|
2Ch |
0P |
>5/H2 |
16 |
1Ed |
1P |
>4/B2 |
|
0Cd |
0P |
>4/H3 |
|
To
maintain life, or go to war, that is the question which concerns us
all! |
8 months after the collapse of the intellectual world on Nov. 24, 2016,
in August 2017, these two above, Trump (top line) and Jong-un
(bottom line), lacking a common
b-balancing ground, p-perceive the full y-necessity
of maintaining power;
Trump is used to §1-expressing himself in >6
very good ways (in his mind as mightiest man on Earth with the best
resources), what is >5 good for his
§2-purpose, Jong-un boasts with >1 very bad ways (atom-bombs,
rockets) to keep his seemingly >6 very good power.
If each is just eager to do what is y-necessary to keep his
position without regards to a common purpose, lacking any other
motivation (beggar the environment/the lives of Korean people as the first
victims) then with such purely interest-based politics, they or
someone else will eventually make a step further towards the abyss of a
atomic holocaust...
The ELC App also works in German with some different
mnemonics, making proper use of the
appropriate
art of expression to ease the
§1-right to express one's one's
§2-purpose in
G5-life so people can develop beyond the mentality of 10-year
old kids rather than degenerate into a
sophisticated intellect...
Peter+Claudio |
Übereinstimmung
Reibung, Stress: |
|
1Kd |
0P |
>3/G4 |
11 |
1Kd |
0P |
>3/G4 |
|
1Kd |
3D |
>6/G5 |
|
|
I |
|
bg |
|
I |
|
- |
|
X |
|
|
1Kd |
0P |
>4/L2 |
66 |
1Kd |
0P |
>4/L2 |
|
2Kd |
0P |
>6/H4 |
Einige Abkürzungen der
Parameter sind auf Englisch
anders:
Some abbreviations for
some parameters differ in
German:
Creativity - Kreativität,
Believe -
Glaube
a - A-Intuition,
f - Fühlen,
t -
Denken, v
- genereller Wert,
R - Lösung
Please remember what
matters is what the
parameters point to, not
the form
of the
pointers. And beware,
the same applies about the
words
used to define the abbreviations. Since
post-normality our
language has been
corrupted by the zeitgeist to
confuse people
about their
OPTION II; it's time to
personally relate
to what the
words
mean to you, in your own experience to make sense! |
16+66=>II-X |
I-Konzeptualisierung unseres |
1Kd |
gemeinsamen Projektes |
OP |
für die §1-Klärung
des für |
>3/G4 |
Pe>1 sehr
Schlechten |
>4/L2 |
Cl>6 sehr
Guten |
|
mit dem §2-Zweck |
1Kd |
dafür I-Konzept für |
OP |
Pe>6 sehr
gut |
>3/G4 |
Cl>6 sehr
gut |
>4/L2 |
das ermöglicht Synergie: |
H4 über G5 |
auf eine X-wesenliche Art |
1<2 (Kd) 3>0 (D/P) |
Remember, YOU ARE MORE than being a breathing,
sweating in passion for society and so on, animal lacking substance
and fulfillment. Never mind if the Dalai Lama calls you a social
animal proving it with his performance and
misusing you as his tribute to the zeitgeist.
You are
indeed the displaced
stepping stone
under the otherwise mass-attractive
OPTION I with your OPTION II substance
- your corner stone - with the potential for Life- through
Task-Fulfillment. On
June 25, 2017
Pope Francis,
called having a personal
relationship to your path that
in truth leads to
your life's
fulfillment, e.g. properly understood,
to Jesus, "dangerous and detrimental". In short it is all
about his kind of church, not about Jesus, let alone YOU. For them "There is
one god,
and that is
the ZG!".
The protestants, intellectuals (Angela Merkel, a protestant
minister's daughter: "Islam belongs to Germany" - the
snake in paradise:
The tree of OPTION I knowledge belongs to you
to become god-like, like the Pope) and now most scientists I
experienced in Switzerland, are not better, just side-tracking
with more intellectual subtlety when turning down people
to not understand themselves to be an
X-inner being to be fulfilled in lifefulfilling
relationships. At the same time the Pope also spoke for
one world government with political
authority - to fight such import things like climate change -
putting
persecution of Christians aside when it comes to
global politics, in order to meintain the
dwindling OPTION I authorities. On
top of it all, the papal church
has elevated itself
as representing God on earth, and thus Jesus
is seen, even by many theologians - in their words - nothing more than as a
once strong literary figure to be used in
mass-attractive,
simplified ways against
conscious science.
|