Have
made your payment before you got here?
Following the
pioneer couple example (Peter+Melissa)
this what I - exemplary for YOU needed to understand about that
h1X1 h2X2 => §1(ch) §2(cX)
- Synergy EXISTENTIAL LOVE CODE (the appropriate one out
10368 possible one'):
§1=right for X=self
(being) expression §2=right
to follow one's X-purpose in one's innate h=living/impact
space or the one in common with one's partner, chosen in a
self-determined way.
The level to
qualify dealing with the >1 very bad, >2 bad,
>3 unsatisfactory, >4 satisfactory, >5 good, >6
very good for X-life-fulfillment (this should be assessed
conscientiously - no value judgment!)
The 16
essential states beginning with a baby's awareness of
X-being in one's h-inner living
space in its 16 social
impact dimensions
with the corresponding >qualification towards synergy with self and
others:
a=conscience/intuition,
p=perception, I=concepts
f=feeling/context radar,
t=thinking,
S=defocus/relax
b=balance,
J=self-justification, !=becoming
essential/dying away *from /with it...
c=profiling,
v=value, M=maximal
perspective
y=minimal necessity,
R=(re) solution
As working
with pioneers like yourselves progresses,
you will get access to further ways to to deepen
your understanding of self, others and your relationship - keep
track of updates on this site and watch the navigation top
growing...
Specifically for my
relationship with Melissa /
so you
can compare the very different keys in yours: Check
her
Facebook site, it is obvious that Melissa has the gift of picking out
the >6 very best food/view/set up in her h-living space
is trying,
despite her very high standards or ideals to come down to people to be >4
at peace with what she perceives; like Diane, my wife in both their h>6
X>4 ways. And then both, (yet Diane+me with JJ/X)
graciously try
to share the peace,
hoping people would take care of the
lower levels of >123 (very
bad/junk food, bad/jealousy, unsatisfying/opinionating) - and can thus
be convinced to >4 appease with each other around them, as in the extreme example of the British pre-war Prime Minister
Chamberlain who compromised with Hitler,
even when his hope were are not justified. And then I came, in me
come in with the whole range h>1 to X>6, according to
Diane, making everybody look stupid for cleaning up what they
left uncared for, while they would rather ignore the undigested
food/that which is non-understood outside their range (6>4)
and let people do as they please hoping they would then pay attention to
and being at ease with each other, ignoring what is really necessary to
approach. Having opened
that Pandora's box of "peace for our time", can be very frustrating because people feel they are torn between the devil and the deep
blue sea. So most people end up hating me
more or less overtly
for pointing out relationship truth; that is how the empire now strikes back trying to
demean the ELC we worked out. Then Melissa, Diane
and I could be tempted to waste our time arguing
about 1/4<>6/6>1;
me and Melissa
failing with pM-S, me and
Diane with JJ-X, falling apart, down
to the >1 very bad from the
otherwise possible synergy;
divided, easy prey for the
rule of the zeitgeist
under OPTION I, sheople
like all the others, pretending to be
free humans
with an infinity of options.
So the
challenge is to not give in to
that temptation, and not compromise our
Existential Love-Code
in relationships, but implement
it in every interaction as lovingly as possible,
keeping one's integrity based on understanding - and facing the
unavoidable challenges
in the process!
[Challenges] [Requirement] [Conscience] [Maintenance]
