Our Testimonials about Ourselves
With or without mere opinions and
mass-attractivity, e.g. the OPTION I
ZG-zeitgeist, we,
Peter and Melissa testify to our commitment to
fulfilling it:
We are committed to making the key for
desirable
relationships available for people who are ready
to give meaning to their innate OPTION II towards life-
through task-fulfillment. Instead of the wordiness
of psycho-pathology followed up by
personally-neutral humanistic
psychology, which is now stuck in
psycho-politics
and spin, our relationship is based
on the OPTION II
of each of us expressed in
relevant
open-ended generative principles.
Melissa's X-being is 4Oe,
mine
is 9Pp In essence:
I, Peter,
1944: "From wherever and with whoever I am, the modeling of substance
such as that of nature and human systems, their
innate laws, is improved through application in relevant human
systems, even when it just is in my life!"
Thus I prepare
Processes with
function F9-making
the personally relevant#3 relationship truth
available, as I did up to 1979 as a physicist in term of
content-free#1 laws of nature in my
profession, before I followed my
X=9Pp's vocation of my being to work out
Applied
Personal Science APS©.
Melissa,
1980: "I always remember taking
care of my body. It's my own introduction to myself - knowledge about
the relevant relationship truth allows me to feel free" Thus letting
her body organize her thinking, she establishes
her
Objectives and F4-manages
their fulfillment in her h-living space. And that based on the
scientific relationship truth about how
to nourish her own and her clients' bodies with
physically non-polluted,
healthy and balanced
nutrients. And this leads her to a fair, mentally motivating
environment and relationships
toward lifefulfilling self-determinedness.
With APS I can provide the relevant
parameters for understanding our
lifefulfilling relationships in a
generally relevant structure. It explains why generally it is
-
not good to live alone,
-
how
and based on what, partners may find each other,
-
and relate, get to really know each other, fall in love, and
experience synergy,
-
and can become aware of their options.
-
The explain
how all the good vibes fade away and all
the courting and effort are wasted, if one
partner does not give sufficient meaning
to the parameters, and the other fails to make him or
her understand how the relationship
can then derail, and with what consequences...
-
To prevent that, it also points out what
and how partners need to understand the relevant relationship truths; with
which parameters, before it is too late
Here is what Melissa (lower line)
and Peter (upper line) need to
understand about their own self and the other. Nobody said relating to
each other is easy, but understanding a mobile
phone to taking full personally relevant use
of it, is more complex - so what is the fuss about
OPTION II? Find out and assess and enquire what your
desirable relationship requires!
1)
hX-Plant/Baby-Awareness
of one's h-living space and what can be fulfilled in it with
one's X-substance: For me that is using my
§1-right to express my
B5-life's fulfill-ment. For
Melissa it is H4-relating to basics
and B1-believing in its cause and
action, say in eating and body care, which brings us to
§2-the right to follow up one's purpose
as already animals can do.
2)
§1§2-Animal/10-year
old qualification: Being serious about my hX I
refer to the >1 very bad OPTION I influences on my h and qualify
in eventually dealing with them with the >6 very good,
my OPTION II, in a responsible way. Melissa follows the >6 in
her h in order to use it to >4 appease the situation in
it with her X-substance.
So her challenge is to not end up creating a
pre-trans-trap,
e.g. suppressing what is uneasy (>1, >2 bad, >3 unsatisfactory) and only
allowing what is >6 very good beyond OPTION I,
even if her thus transcending the social
trap might be seen as
%1-socially incompatible by some people
prepared to scarifying the possible >5 good in
their relationship with her...
 3) If the above
hX-challenge is unmet by just one partner, both simply become
part
of the problem. It begins with shying away from
the as yet never experienced possibility of synergy, avoiding the
onset as a seeming risk out of fear,
ignorance or arrogance. Then meaning of a sustainable relationship, and
the chance of keeping it, is lost in favor of clinging to the usual
habits
and the mob associated with it. Therefore here, we
outline what nobody dares talking about under OPTION I, but everyone suffers
from, beginning with Ma=applying manipulation power, cO=considering
the relevant orientation for qualification with the basic relationship
truth of
aM / cO = STRESS < DEATH. Having failed in O-qualification, all I can do in
any relationship is struggle with
my h/§1 and y/§2, the unqualified >1 very bad y-necessity
in my then >1 very bad h-living space. And Melissa
is left >3 dissatisfied with §1-expressing something !-essential
through which she could otherwise J-justify herself.
The point is such an effortless irresponsible approach
of simply §1-expressing one's
wished for §2-purpose
is relying on the mainstream experience of others, OPTION I.
Without one's own hX- and §1§2-qualification,
left with mere §1-§2 opinions, more or less on the level
of 10-year old kids, or substanceless
intellectuals and politicians with
their nihilistic, attention and power greedy
philosophy, one has no future! Instead, one is left in the rat race
of
the intellectual pecking order in which I am as a
13-PeopleProphet on the lowest
rank 12, and Melissa one above in rank 11 as a
11-PeopleWorker. Then Melissa is seeing herself at best as
first among equals, as a "benevolent dictator". Under this
intellectual-wordy OPTION I scenario, I am seen rightly as
inferior, and Melissa as aimless.
Such is how
others who have defaulted are criticizing the way I c-profile my contribution and
Melissa's for her lack of mass-attractive I-concepts.
Thus under the OPTION I
prejudice cult,
everyone perceives everyone else as lacking on the
§3-integrity essential mode, while all
everyone else seem to be OK with
themselves. Thus on the lowest rank, I myself become
a potential scapegoat while all are tagged with a prejudice
%6-projecting an
OPTION I deficiency,
children then treated by the social mafia's psychology, and
at worst with nerve poison cocktails such as Ritalin and so on,
some ending up in the drug or some crime/extremists' scenes, or become
part of some other social risk up to suicide.
At best people then follow their desire for a
complementary relationship outside the family and the group, clan
,society they
were born into. With 24 I went to Israel, emotionally, best understood in
the family
model (not to be mixed up with gender spin) because the best
of the Jewish culture is like me, a 2nd
daughter (Cinderella - seeking the inner alternative). With 36
I went to Australia, both countries with cultural mentalities
that let me develop another side of myself beyond the arena the Swiss
society and mentality
allowed me. Those who know Melissa know she is a worldwide
traveler, in her words: "Moving not to escape life, but so that life
does not escape her".
 Emotionally
Melissa is like a hope giving first born prince who is looking for a
kingdom to take over and a princess to fit him. At present of editing
this page, she sails into Venice at the end of a cruise hosting a
medical conference. Thus she has had to face and conquer many
challenges / dragons and came to meet me in 2015 to start our project as did the prince in "Cinderella".
Some people like Cinderella's step sister,
ponder in their mind, that this all seems too romantic for an
OPTION I §3-inferior
lowest rank 13-PeopleProphet
and are glad they thus have a good excuse to miss the point
our project is all about - a M-maximal perspective for human
relationships to allow L3-reframing
this world, bottom-up.
It takes sentient people to get it rather
than displace me as crazy, our
project as a not OK stumbling block
for their OPTION I minds...
Beyond understanding each other
sufficiently as metaphorically outlined above, only a common
commitment allows
individuals to build a sustainable mutually desirable
relationship. Nature offers couples such a commitment through caring for
their children after the initially exciting sexual relationship has
started everything off. It is exciting to find out how two human being
can fall in p-love, e.g. get committed to their
substantial common purpose, as exemplified between me and
Melissa.
We invite you to follow up
our experience with our ELC on the next site in the
navigation below leading to
our commitment...
|
