What is appropriate
for Knowledge Work + Science?
The
mass-attractively
prevailing
OPTION I
is NOT appropriate
for YOUR OPTION II!
That is obviously
true for me and all
the people in the miserable parts of this world. For many people it
works in more subtle ways
and so the majority
obviously still falls
for what inhibits their lifefulfillment...
1) Zeitgeist I-Concepts
versus OPTION II
Under
OPTION I, science, above all the popular
humanities, primarily serve
celebrities' activities. In the Middle Ages that was perfected in
the courts (Vatican with its impressive art by Michelangelo,
Versailles, spin doctors & Co.)
to
serve [Facebook] successful power games
(rhetoric,
philosophers, Jesuits, Machiavelli,
intellectuals, media & Co.). All
this is
serving the mass attractive of playing with
people as chess
figures (soldiers, voters, consumers). Thus the
B4-truth in people's
§1-expressions is
dismissed; %6-projected as non %1-socially
compatible by the thus %5-manipulated
masses, because the truth
competes with the way
celebrities live to deal
on top of their OPTION I world.
It was in such a context that
Melissa Sterling p-perceived me for the first time when I
tried to get the M-maximum from a celebrity, the famous US spin
doctor Joel D.
Roberts (there because the world has changed with profound
consequences...)
2012 in Mannheim.
Rather than flipping out like the mass of people when that celebrity
demeaned with what I challenged him with in a primitive way, the
mass in the firm
spinning grip, Melissa approached me later in Geneva for a S-relaxing
meeting away from the mass.
On the
occasion above, 2015 in Zürich [YouTube], I got some
applause from the Swiss people, but the
PalaceMaster took over again going on
talking about "The Swiss government
selling out Switzerland to the
European
Union"
- doing it the same way to me to restore his
celebrity in a hall with some 600 people. He did it by
demeaning what I really said, that
Switzerland needs a university to open up
science for modeling real human systems rather than more
celebrity art activities which this
billionaire supports. Only the former can
!-deepen the 6Ba-Swiss identity
sufficiently to face the y-necessity of the time, in order to
restore its v-value; the
latter dissolves it in the zeitgeist! So in
essence, that former Federal Counselor Christoph Blocher put down
our possible y!/v "love" relationship in favor of his §1§2-tv/p
towards Mv/f, that of Switzerland, which results in their common
existential love code cX/c, c-profiling their common X-essence.
As the opposition leader in was him in 1991 to prevent
Switzerland from joining the EU, so that Switzerland could
preserve
its X-identity.
In the meantime, him stuck in his ">4 public
peace with what is >2 bad for business",
42-right
wing OPTION I, Switzerland's own
intellectuals and most
politicians fired up by Blocher's
Swiss People Party, have shamelessly and
successfully demeaned the Swiss essence,
mobbed Blocher out of government and put him down on every occasion,
having already prepared a victory celebration
when he finally quits politics.
That
fit the equally substanceless
31-INTERNATIONAL-socialist
ideology, according to which the 42-right is so >3 unsatifactory,
that, stated explicitly by Lenin, ever >1 very bad means, up to
random terror, is justified. Meanwhile Donald Trump has given the
intellectual mafia
a decisive blow that made its already dead sick
OPTION I knowledge work collapse on Nov. 24. 2011 - 8
months afterwards, Melissa has come here to work out our next step.
On the other hand, and for the same reason, the wit's end for
both Blocher and Trump, both billionaires
and power politicians, is in sight just
like the walled in German Democratic Republic shortly before 1989 when
the Berlin wall fell. What remains for them without
OPTION II is just to procrastinate their
end in the permanently self-destructive word of
OPTION I with whatever that means for all nationally, and
globally concerned [Facebook], just like
the band on the sinking Titanic 1912
all due to the same thinking-catastrophe of ignorance for
OPTION II...
In conclusion,
I state that free
'anything goes' art and
wordy philosophy are to be replaced by the
more encompassing
APPROPRIOLOGY, the science that is
obliged to conscientiously work out
appropriate
ways of §1-expressing the various
§2-purposes relevant for the
life-fulfillment of human beings, beyond the mental flat
OPTION I!
It is to be based on the existential awareness of
real human being's inner h-living space and
what their X-being can fulfill
beyond what child psychology and
pedagogy, obliged to
philosophy,
have so far conditioned people in school to
keep them manageable, as grown-ups, divided, via psycho-politics'
spin.
2)
Keep your §3-Integrity
Static
engineers follow physics appropriology to serve architects
or they end in court! Mathematicians serve theoretical physicists to serve experimental physicists.
The later
serve engineers. And as you very well know it can not always be
said that the latter serve people, let alone
journalists, politicians, lawyers, bankers,
priests in view of
money,
fame, power,
and having failed their training and conditioning as
smart psychopaths -
pedophilia and so on for sublimation.
There are even of all sorts of doctors following
hidden agendas rather than
the best of appropropriology initiated
here and now.
Good will alone, but
untrained in appropriateness, thus unqualified, in a
society playing on
freedom of opinion with hidden
OPTION I agendas, does not work let alone
%1-politically correct man-made substance
less morals, ideals,
42/31-ideologies
and so on as the last century of ideologies proved in terrible way...
3)
Remain self-determined in Bm-multiplying Rules and
Boundaries
Here
is an example of appropriate ways of
§1-expressing one's §2-purpose; the blue
balls in their size show the distribution of the
§1§2-pairs with their essentials modes.
Mine is hy (14,9
white).
There are 170 other non-essential possibilities
as the points of views from which
fake news and
spin emerge! Take bb
(1,1) for "tolerant" "anything
goes" "norms" dancing on all
marriages floating with the ZG-wind...
So besides the 86x86/2=3698 potentially
appropriately fulfilling relationships, there are
170x170/2=14450 superficial non-appropriate
fake relationship possibilities between; in them,
"breathing persons" addicted to
substance less small talk. Such is
the virtual space for the already more than
70 gender types, and psychiatry to go on inventing new
lucrative mental
disorders, and for Hollywood, sects
and politics to remain in the
intellectuals business. All of that supports people to
hide
themselves behind a fake point of view/fig
leaf, selling their soul/capability to experience/§3-integrity
short of conscience.
So they end up, born as originals with a
lifefulfilling potential, as copies
of their self-destructive OPTION I prejudices
trying to thus please the
"others". Thus I would
have to go along being "inferior",
OPTION I dealing
with me like the Nazis did with the Jews, denying my very
X-existence, Melissa "aim- and concept less
just helping", Donald Trump "familiar
with politics",
Vladimir Putin "upright for himself".
See how
people campaign with it, aiming for a position,
where they can
overcome it. With some other people, that
works seemingly rewarding to get away
with blue murder as long as they serve the
devil of OPTION I. But with Melissa the OPTION I denial of her works laser sharply
focused in trying to blow out her §3/I-concepts in the Bm-dimension
where ZG claims the monopoly in m-multiplying
nihilistically substance less B-boundary conditions. So
I/we had no other
reasonable self-determined choice but to
fM/S-commit in our relationship to overcome the permanently,
in 170 ghost holes
inessential self-destructive
zeitgeist based on our
essential OPTION II!
4) Feel free to find
out for yourself - not free of the consequences...
So please tell me
- which science
really supports your
relationship to your innate h-living space and the options
you have to fulfill your X-being in it, other than the love of
your mother as a baby?
- what did school do for you to qualify
for hX - §1§2 and to form
fulfilling relationship
with all its %1-polical correctness with a
pedagogy
[in German] polluted with a
philosophy
from a distant past? How about the media
and all the well-meaning people you relate to?
- What
failures do they (e.g.
intellectual- and politics-minded, smokers & Co.) keep
luring you into by
%5-manipulating the possible synergy with them in a win
for them-lose for you way?
- what does
religion and science tell you about who you are, and how
the Creator a-supports your B2-breakthrough
to a B3-path, in B4-truth, in
your conscience - within his H2-superior
order? What
about H4-relating
to the X-substance with a body suited for your
B5-life-fulfillment you undeniably have
available to cope with the increasing mad
H3-realities worked out under OPTION I
in human systems?
- how did you, if at all learn what your
§1-ground §2-purpose /
synergy
clarity, and together with other the common
EXISTENTIAL LOVE CODE for "falling
in love" really is and how to
achieve synergy with what intimacy to
sustain a desirable relationship?
Can you agree,
that there is an urgent need for
Appropropriology? Let us face it, only
understanding leads to desirable results no just conditioned know-how!
If YES, thoroughly study the sites in the order of the links below.
|