3.2/§2) Being requires a Think-System beyond
               the 9 Ideologies of Philosophy

It is time to §2-purposfully overcome the Pm-multiplication of the process of the evolution of the philosophical zeitgeist spin about "being" in the service of OPTION I. Its thinking cata-strophes about the >6 very good B4-truth in terms of what leads to individual lifefulfillment, have F3-led to more than enough very tangible human catastrophes! They arise by pretending philosophy's spin 11-serves the 22-common good! While in fact the discipline of philosophy allows at best the onset to taking responsibility for insights and understanding, usually it pre-trans-traps it, as will be shown again and again until the penny drops for at least some people!

With ontology of the real human being, I understand the systematic answer to the question of how human personally relevant existence fulfills life (OPTION II) and what prevents us from (OPTION I as such) it. With the real metaphysics of personally relevant actuality, I understand the live practically relevant modeling of the OPTIONS I and II with personally relevant comprehensive "open-ended generative principles" (oegp) - that is, from the real human user's point of view, among others about the usage of the possibilities of what physics has made possible in dealing with things, also in society, and with the awareness of the possible relationships.

From my own experience of life and from the understanding of numerous real people and their human systems in many relationships, teams, countries, religions and cultures, I stand for an ontological realism in terms of X=individual being real people, and its actuality and not about the philosophically, open or hidden, prevailing metaphysical nihilism, but that ontology is to serve a life practical, clinically testable relevance of metaphysics. Since 1979 I have made just that possible with the still everywhere missing 4th faculty, Applied Personal Science (APS).

So I claim there is a relevant stringent modeling (EXCEL programmable) of X with one oegp out of a set of 1728 possible ones in a way that does conceptual justice (as long as the being is still conscious of running the body) to allow some awareness of it to his/her ethically-functional life fulfillments. For that purpose the relevant oegp to be identified, points to the qualifications for, and the lifefulfillment; in the 16 relevant social impact dimensions with the 16 essential states of being that allow OPTION II. And that, not in a philosophically, denotational manner (OPTION I), which via thinking-, evokes human catastrophes in the name of some mass-attractivity. But the so far missing science rather opens up to the fulfillment of life in view of its inevitable end on this earth, to generate out of one's being with what is required for its fulfillment according to its principle, that is with OPTION II. This challenge give rise to the 4 possible faculties of knowledge work, out of which up to now, only 3 are organized publically in the basic faculties (forms-words-numbers). Thinking and conceptualizing in oegp is pre-trans- traped with the 3 taboos against story telling, metaphors, being denounced as ego. That gives rise to 12 possible ideologies, 9 of which together with the 8 inessential states of being allow OPTION I. Free from OPTION I, free with OPTION II, it is even possible to prove the congruence between the X-essence of a philosopher with his or her OPTION I philosophy! Even these people are not just bundles of illusions as many of them think, above all Prof. Markus Gabriel. The structure of their bundling points at least to the OPTION I of their X...

In Short, being under OPTION I is restricted

1) in its nine basic function F1-9, worst in F9=getting a substantial overview as a basic orientation; it is restricted as bad (for OPTION I) to trend-philosophy.

2) by its denotational pre-trans- traping language

3) by explaining the substance of personal life and its actuality in other-determined ways, rather relevant to the evolution of language in the  social zeitgeist evolution, while the non-substantial states of mind are used to seduce people by spin doctors for hidden agendas in psycho-politics, and marketing

4) by science#2, above all philosophy which claims the leading edge of OPTION I towards its zeitgeist and the next trend, wile in fact most philosophers are just sublimating their OPTION II with there philosophies mostly void of any relevance for real life!

Context