Context

[UP]
[Philosophy]
[Being Transcends]
[Heidegger]
[Art - Philosophy - Real Life]
[Art - Philosophy - Real Life]
[Real Life]
[Mobs]
[Spin]
[Philosophical Post-Normality]
[Abysss]
[Superior]
[Order]
[Synchronized]
[Plan A]
[Plan B]
[Trend]
                    


Dr. Peter Meier, Founder of Applied Personal Science APS© -
with MyOPTION II

 Zeitgeist Trend - Learning Machines

Ginni with her 23-13-12/L1>6 hXI Ideologies

Since 1896, IBM is shaping they way machines handle data and information
with a business boost by the Nazis who organized the genocide with IBM card
punch machines. IBM almost disappeared when its plan A, being the worlds
leader of mainframe computers got challenged by the missed personal computer.
But then IBM woke up kept reshaping itself with plan B shifting its identity towards
a software solution provider for above all big business.

And now plan B are learning machines to change man-machine relationships
and man's role beyond traditional ways. 


 
APS.gif (1053 bytes)

3.17) Humans versus Robots

 


Here comes Virginia Maria "Ginni" Rometty, IBM’ CEO with her RIGTHEOUSNESS to once more 23-reshape IBM beyond its products! And also with mass-attractive partnerships such as with Apple and Twitter, to exploit new mobile technologies, and serving cloud computing and cyber security by making use, beyond what real people are capable of, of artificial intelligence (AI). This is pretending those zeitgeist united hypes will become the new solution for the global h-living space in which IBM is still part of the problem of OPTION I! Such should be IBM’s new pioneering frontier "cognitive computing”.

It is supposed to help for example the X-substantial potential of doctors make diagnosis, lawyers conduct legal discovery – of loopholes? – journalists, conduct investigation – on big data the NSA way? The new age of IBM machines will go beyond the traditional way for plan A; counting things in programmable ways by which IBM made to the top of OPTION I now engulfed in clouds. Therefore IBM's new plan B are new robot like machines which will GENUINELY be able to learn from the so far operational  plan A as is IBM already supposed to do cooperatively under Rometty’s 13-X serving-prophetic leadership. The aim is and may-be for the last time, man are leading the way, towards IBM's planned super robot computer, called "Watson machine". You guess, OPTION II is to be outsourced from failing people to flawless machines and robots as foreseen in all its pre and con, by the father of science fiction, Isaac Asimov culmination in Giskard, the robot who programmed into himself plan B after his man made plan A based on the 3 Laws of Robotics failed when humanity become self destructive on Earth stuck with its OPTION I plan A, neuro-linguistically inhibited to learn beyond it. And with that self-made plan B Giskard made to L1-love humanity based on plan A up to L2-timely exchange of project-oriented competence, kept L3-reframing critical people's mind's so they could prevent OPTION I minded people lacking conscience from destroying humanity. Thus Giskard is portrayed a 23-man-made, 13-self-made Spirit with better access to some real human being as the genuine Holy spirit through conscience based OPTION II.

 

After leading people by STUBBORN people without a genuine plan A for desirable future has been a human catastrophe under OPTION I in humanity's past, IBM is now supposed to fix human failure with machines which are supposedly unbiased – unlike Putin’s & Co.’s execution of OPTION I laws getting closer to what in fiction made Giskard deal with the ultimate necessity to come up ultimate plan B beyond his OPTION I making, a mere substance less fiction! But for YOU and ME, before Putin & Co. fuck it up any OPTION II, the ultimate challenge to fulfill what we are here for in synergy with L1-L2-L3 free from OPTION I's pulling!


In the meantime JOYFUL IBM's with its chairwoman since 2012, Rometty has already initiated cyber conversations between herself and IBM’s some 480’000 employees in its mandatory "Think Academy", not to be mixed with Academy4 Think-Systems. The aim is to persuade her staff to reinvent themselves beyond focusing on their traditional products and services. Similarly most people have to reinvent themselves beyond their traditional national values, according to big global business, to become better followers of the machine speeded up Zeitgeist – where they not stubborn like the Swiss people who want to be their own sovereign and people like me, who claim their OPTION II working for LifeFulfilling Platforms instead with their OPTION II plan B.

Murad Ahmed, founder of Deep Mind, now Google owned, is a bit more specific about the kind of AI he and Google envisage. Personally he want to fulfill his potential in becoming the father of AI that is supposed to enhance our minds towards solving the most pressing problems as humanity's most powerful creation yet. Admitting there might be unique things about humans, he thinks there isn't anything non-computable in the brain. But he rises the question like Asimov, how to prevent artificially intelligent beings to simply do away with people as outdated and faulty gadgets and rather guide and assist us than being misused for mass manipulation and making war.

However, the science community is still entertained say by a person who thinks he is "Joscha" having studied philosophy and computer science talking about how to build a mind with wishful thinking and obviously no clue who he really is, but can make people think they hear about the leading edge of AI.

 

But what are the role models for AI, specifically for IBM's plan B reframing under OPTION I? Is it the last famous theologian Karl Barth who reframed theology, after its terrible failure in the terrible age of ideologies of the 20th century, and similarly and Martin Heidegger who tried it with philosophy? Is it Eric Fromm who similarly reframed psychology, or Rometty’s predecessor Samuel Palmisano who reframed IBM from a hardware to a software producer, or Isaac Asimov as mentioned above? All of them just renewed OPTION I with more sophisticated methods, spin and technology as old vine in new skin. So will IBM’s new shift from people- to robotware, leaving people in the dust of their threatened COMFORT behind, under OPTION I for which robots are now becoming fitter than real human beings who are still born with their innate OPTION II? Such an attitudinal change can only result in an artificial enhanced OPTION I beyond the still prevailing added value based OPTION I, which is still maintained by spin doctors. Will the latter be replaced by NSA type of artificial big data analysis with a final global formal closure of OPTION I? And that could then no longer be reframed by humans anymore, even at the abyss, when the resulting, closed systemically machine-enhanced thinking-catastrophes would be ever wider and faster globally self-destructive! Will IBM have to learn the lesson they could have from doing business with the Nazis have to learn the global hard, Giskard way?

Is Putin’s role that of the bad cop speeding up the good cop's capitalist's process in this direction allowing legitimizing a deeper range of cyber psycho-politics with the need for more cyber wars aiming at every remaining OPTION II source such as potentially YOU? Just as the former communist psychological warfare weakened the intellectuals, so does it Putin together the US-spin on the other side of the coin! Thus Putin continues the former Soviet's role to weaken people’s minds for the then "Evil Impire" to win the outcome of history, now enough to accept the New World Disorder to be driven by IBM, Google, Facebook & Co., lacking any effective OPTION II. Or is there a chance that one of their CEO's considers his OPTION II after the obvious disaster Putin is tinkering with, under the spell if his 8 "dark evil inner voices", his secret service trained OPTION I non-essential, OPTION I bound states of being? Let it be know, they are modeled ready to understand.

 

The remaining question is, who will get it first, some CEO,
some politician like Putin or Blocher, or YOU?



 

Context

>