222-Implementation: [UP] [Challenges] [Requirement] [Conscience] [Maintenance]

Nothing aM-man-made is fulfilling without understanding and cO-considering the relevant relationship truths

 How to keep a relationship Alive and with Synergy 

 

This site only makes sense for people who have had the conscious experience (free but priceless; Facebook picture from Melissa, hX:64) of falling into a relevant EXISTENTIAL LOVE CODEd relationship and are now willing to maintain that relationships' possible synergy. Please reconsider the exemplary experience about fulfillment in a relationship and also aM / cO = STRESS < DEATH to begin deepening your understanding:

"Whatever we do unconsciously, reactively, automatically; we probably fail? But performed consciously, our awareness grows, I guess?" That is the kind of the zeitgeist prophet's rhetoric with which these devil's advocates try to open other people's Pandora's box - like the zeitgeist, to make all their subjects equal. Look at what is on the tongues of many of the figures in the picture below; the flames (subtle hypes)! It depicts this >1 very bad influence creeping, not just into my h-living space, like a plague. On the left side you see the man standing up with §3-integrity, who was aware of the group's OPTION I degeneration; Niklaus von Flüe, who actually saved Switzerland 1481 from the zeitgeist, against which it was founded 1291. Based on his insight into what was  >6 very good about Switzerland and his X-life-task to save it, which shines through on top of the picture; his EXISTENTIAL LOVE CODE with his country. After he refused to be their leader, as did Jesus on Palm Sunday, every interaction of his led to synergy up to saving Switzerland from a civil war in which it could have been dissolved within a mad Europe. His approach works is required in our time beyond intellectuals who have mutated into substance- and country traitors as is mass-attractive in the OPTION I. Its time actually ended on Nov. 24, 2016. This end was initiated in my home country specifically since 1991, when the Swiss intellectuals began putting the supposed self-fulfilling prophecy "700-years Switzerland is enough!" into action. Who can be surprised when people seek fulfillment in other countries to balance the narrow-mindedness in their own, when it is betraying the ELC with their citizens, in the name of the supposed media demo-crazy, or in Spain against it once moren. As above, so below; loving relationships and synergy evoke jealousy and subtle challenges, so most people would rather stay single like Papageno (page 42) in Mozart's Magic Flute when faced with the challenge of investing their lives in friendship and love (page 40) for which Tamino, the Prince, e.g. relying on understanding the relevant, open-ended generative principles, qualified, like me (upper) and Melissa (lower line in our pM-S  Pandora's boxes), facing the zeitgeist's temptation to become divided in order to be ruled. People fall when they allow the zeitgeist zombies to limit them in their own >qualification in maintaining the relationship:

2Cd 3D >6/B3
  p  
2Ed 2D >6/§0
 common ground based on
 the OPTION II p-perception
1Eh 2D

>6/§0

  M  
2Cd OP >6/B5
 common purpose
 towards a M-maximal
 perspective
1Ed 2D

>4/B2

  S  
1Kd 3D >2/H2
 synergy when S-
 defocusing from
 OPTION I
  p-Focusing on Understanding M-Tuning in Trusting S-Synergy Challenges
OI 2d design structure C/E creation/evolution 1Eh<2Cd 1.d K/E
OII D standing up for the #2/3 that is where the zeitgeist temps us to turn away from each other... 2<0 D/P D 2/3

>

>6 for the best 6 4>2

=

While it is easy for us to focus on what is necessary for us#2 to agree on D-definition power based on the B3-paths which I outline for Melissa to §0-sustain the basis of the >6 very best we can come up with. If we tune into what is our >6 very good purpose of our relationship, we go beyond the intellectual power game in which the palace#2 < is framed by the temple#0 so both can rule the people#1...

Synergy through d-designing how to serve#1 people with appropriate D-definition power to overcome what is >2 bad inside themselves so their world can come to >4 peace, in synergy.

We have to mutually understand both our ways - mine as a C-creative researcher in personally-relevant#3 matters; under OPTION I, in seeming opposition to Melissa's caring for the E-evolution of personally-neutral#2 ways to help being successful - in her words as a "benevolent dictator", emotionally the 1st Prince/first among equals in giving hope. We need to trust our own but different powers; my for D-defining OPTION II as generally the best, Melissa in her position, how to convince people to give them a lifefulfilling chance based on her exemplary experience just as she does it for healthy nourishment. Here the challenge is that when my d-designs are proven right#2, I  fine tune them in E-evolutio-nary ways, while Melissa has a need to support what works with personal#3 C-creativity. This page is just one of the results of our synergy, even when she was at another end of the world when I did it, her energy was still around.
 

11
Rf
33

If we fail to maintain our ELC, we end up §1§2-raving about how we f-felt about our possible R-(re)solutions; me in terms of the >1 very bad unqualified y-necessity in my h-living space, Melissa about her >3 dissatisfaction about having failed to become sufficiently essential in her J-self-justification

And here is another example with me and Claudio Lütscher, 7Ow, a long time friend and a film producer, w-working out films with the O-objective of gaining F7-influence on the meaning of OPTION II in relationships:

1Cd 0P >3/B4 11 1Cd 0P >3/B4   1Cd 3D >6/B5
  I   bv   I   -   X  
1Cd 0P >4/L2 66 1Cd 0P >4/L2   2Cd 0P >6/H4
Our ELC is 16 + 66 => II-X: We cooperate best in I-conceptualizing X-LifeFulfilling Platforms such as for Workshops.

In fact you can notice that we have little potential friction about our common I-conceptualization, though our X-essential approach is quite different when it comes to X-synergy: Claudio with his OPTION I 2Cd is > intellectually above mine with 1Cd, while my 3D OPTION II is, even as intellectually inappropriate, above 0P - a good reason to overcome the intellectual pecking order with what makes a >6 very good space of synergy for me modeling B5-life's fulfillment in terms of Claudio's interest in the relevant H4-ways to relate to the underlying laws of life. If we fail in synergy, then we are left trying to b-balance our v-values, me in terms of the >1 very bad unqualified y-necessity in my h-living space, Claudio in search of the fast dwindling, (before the point of NO return still marginally  possible >6 very good S-defocus in his f-feelings. But in our II-X coded relationship, among others, Claudio's presence supported me in automating the wording (left side below) of our ELC based in its II-X parameters:

Peter+Claudio
16+66=>II-X

Of course the computer created text to the right from the ELC Parameters requires editing from someone who fully understands the system:

I-concept of our
common project
for the clarification of 
Pe>1 very bad
Cl>6 very good

...beyond bv-raving 11-66, the purpose is to give meaning to OPTION II with all appropriate means each of us has available from videos to LifeFulfilling Platforms in Workshops, beginning with supporting people to get clear about the hx-"baby" awareness; me 16 (covering the h>1 with the X>6 very good), Claudio 66 (perfectionist in video production), meeting people where they come from, under OPTION I, open for OPTION II...

with the §2-purpose
for this I-concept for
Pe>6 very good
Cl>6 very good
which allows synergy 
in a X-being/substance way 

Claudio comes from the very hX>6 very good, h-grounded in the G4-truth of X-being in tune with the H4-substantial relationship truth, seeking his way to G5-life, examples of which  interest him e.g. Permaculture - it cannot be [Claudio's master video] that humanity destroys what the plant mind has fulfilled in our living space,  Earth! That is the common >1 very bad ground we are dedicated to restoring with the >6 very best in us. Some think we are crazy and not ok...


Donald Trump + Kim Jong-un:

2Ch 3D >5/B2 65 1Eh 2D >6/H1   0Eh 2D >5/§3
  b   IS   p  

-

  y  
2Ch 0P >5/H2 16 1Ed 1P >4/B2   0Cd 0P >4/H3

To maintain life, or go to war, that is the question which concerns us all!

8 months after the collapse of the intellectual world on Nov. 24, 2016, in August 2017, these two above, Trump (top line) and Jong-un (bottom line), lacking a common b-balancing ground, p-perceive the full y-necessity of maintaining power; Trump is used to §1-expressing himself in >6 very good ways (in his mind as mightiest man on Earth with the best resources), what is >5 good for his §2-purpose, Jong-un boasts with >1 very bad ways (atom-bombs, rockets) to keep his seemingly >6 very good power. If each is just eager to do what is y-necessary to keep his position without regards to a common purpose, lacking any other motivation (beggar the environment/the lives of Korean people as the first victims) then with such purely interest-based politics, they or someone else will eventually make a step further towards the abyss of a atomic holocaust...

The ELC App also works in German with some different mnemonics, making proper use of the appropriate art of expression to ease the §1-right to express one's one's §2-purpose in G5-life so people can develop beyond the mentality of 10-year old kids rather than degenerate into a sophisticated intellect...

Peter+Claudio

Übereinstimmung
Reibung, Stress:

1Kd 0P >3/G4 11 1Kd 0P >3/G4   1Kd 3D >6/G5
  I   bg   I   -   X  
1Kd 0P >4/L2 66 1Kd 0P >4/L2   2Kd 0P >6/H4

 

 

Einige Abkürzungen der Parameter sind auf Englisch anders:
Some abbreviations for some parameters differ in
German:
Creativity - Kreativität, Believe - Glaube
a - A-Intuition, f - Fühlen, t - Denken, v - genereller Wert, R - L
ösung
Please remember what matters is what the parameters point to, not
the form of the pointers. And
beware, the same applies about the
words used to define the abbreviations. Since post-normality our
language has been corrupted by the zeitgeist to confuse people
about their OPTION II; it's time to
personally relate to what the
words mean to you, in your own experience to make sense!

16+66=>II-X
I-Konzeptualisierung unseres 1Kd
gemeinsamen Projektes OP
für die §1-Klärung des für >3/G4
Pe>1 sehr Schlechten >4/L2
Cl>6 sehr Guten
mit dem §2-Zweck 1Kd
dafür I-Konzept für OP
Pe>6 sehr gut >3/G4
Cl>6 sehr gut >4/L2
das ermöglicht Synergie: H4 über G5
auf eine X-wesenliche Art  1<2 (Kd) 3>0 (D/P)

Remember, YOU ARE MORE than being a breathing, sweating in passion for society and so on, animal lacking substance and fulfillment. Never mind if the Dalai Lama calls you a social animal proving it with his performance and misusing you as his tribute to the zeitgeist. You are indeed the displaced stepping stone under the otherwise mass-attractive OPTION I with your OPTION II substance - your corner stone - with the potential for Life- through Task-Fulfillment. On June 25, 2017 Pope Francis, called having a personal relationship to your path that in truth leads to your life's fulfillment, e.g. properly understood, to Jesus, "dangerous and detrimental". In short it is all about his kind of church, not about Jesus, let alone YOU. For them "There is one god, and that is the ZG!". The protestants, intellectuals (Angela Merkel, a protestant minister's daughter: "Islam belongs to Germany" - the snake in paradise: The tree of OPTION I knowledge belongs to you to become god-like, like the Pope) and now most scientists I experienced in Switzerland, are not better, just side-tracking with more intellectual subtlety when turning down people to not understand themselves to be an X-inner being to be fulfilled in lifefulfilling relationships. At the same time the Pope also spoke for one world government with political authority - to fight such import things like climate change - putting persecution of Christians aside when it comes to global politics, in order to meintain the dwindling OPTION I authorities. On top of it all, the papal church has elevated itself as representing God on earth, and thus Jesus is seen, even by many theologians - in their words - nothing more than as a once strong literary figure to be used in mass-attractive, simplified ways against conscious science.
 

[UP] [Challenges] [Requirement] [Conscience] [Maintenance]

 

 

Dr. Peter Meier
Founder of
Applied Personal Science APS© Privacy Policy Terms

Phone: +41 44/432 89 59, Skype: ahaaps
Bachmattstr. 23, CH-8048 Zürich (Switzerland)

It's all about personally-relevant relationship truths, relating to self, one's body, infra-structure, personal and cultural relationships, rather than just hypes and in-formation about content-free or personally-neutral  matters...