Welcome to your OPTION II

but don't kid yourself, it is not aimless and inferior despite its appearance...

[Home] [Psychohistory] [Responsibility] [Synergy]
 

What do you think will happen when you have prejudices (cake), and by contrast, when you understand (eat it; digest it, integrate it)? Above the one who seems to present something like InFeriority (IF - me) under OPTION I, will end up feeding the goat, while the one who seems to represent Aimlessness (AL - Melissa), will film my feeding the goat as a cute Facebook post! That is how real human beings are framed into a socially compatible surface to fit under OPTION I! In fact, Melissa and I were at the above biggest island in Switzerland to relax from the challenges of working for the basics of Life- through Task-Fulfillment, OPTION II - towards allowing MyPlatforms for U2. Would YOU like to go beyond bleating about OPTION I to learn to understand Your OPTION II?

Imagine AL, Melissa, levitating people to her level of challenge, in order for them to become good company for her. However, she  does not offer a definite direction, in terms of mass-attractivity, that could simply be followed by all. And this is why those, who are not open for their own personally relevant challenge, see her as AimLess. Instead they end up wondering where she travels to, and what competence and motivation she exercises...
 

Imagine IF, me. Peter, making people tune into their inner resources, by which they can face their challenge in life- through task-fulfillment, as the womb does to deliver a baby. People, who think they are already grown up, consider this an InFerior approach, for it is not socially compatible. They then wonder how I can make those of good will understand relationship truths about their inner self and those they thought they knew...
 

Imagine AL+IF=the encounter between an open-ended, seemingly aimless challenge, and someone generating principles beyond OPTION I. The latter seems a futile OPTION I rat race, which therefore appears to be inferior in OPTION I terms of tinkering with the mere end of gaining mass-attractivity. However, open-ended generating principles are the key to understanding the OPTION II of real people, just as Isaac Newton's differential calculus became the key for the breakthrough of modern physics in mechanics. You see, things are not what they seem - after all people are not things...

In short, what seems meaningless under OPTION I, has its meaning, regardless of surrounding opinions when Melissa with her 4Oe, and Peter with his 9Pp principles of lifefulfillment work together in the then possible 3Bw-synergy with you: Melissa F4-managing the Oe-establishment of the OPTION II objective, Peter F9-providing the basic overview to Pp-prepare the process in which real people can learn to understand their OPTION II. And this leads to synergy towards Bw-working out the F3-tangible eight boundary conditions to transcend OPTION I.

Melissa demonstrates this below, at the leading edge of the mainstream, undisguised guidelines for personal growth workshops:  

Are you prepared to CLICK NOW to Find out the prejudice you receive based on philosophy and psychology, which some call science, and to find out how your can overcome OPTION I by understanding how to transcend it with your OPTION II? We are talking about the inside out, that which is considered to be too complicated for "people" under OPTION I, of outside in, and which is attracting the same prejudices and excuses world-wide to avoid any substance of self, at all costs, the latter now on all walls and complained about out of almost all faces in most books to keep the OPTION I fire burning...